Re: [PATCH] rpc.statd: Bind downcall socket to loopback address

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 3, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/01/2011 04:13 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> In the past, rpc.statd posted SM_NOTIFY requests using the same socket
>> it used for sending downcalls to the kernel.  To receive replies from
>> remote hosts, the socket was bound to INADDR_ANY.
>> 
>> With commit f113db52 "Remove notify functionality from statd in
>> favour of sm-notify" (Mar 20, 2007), the downcall socket is no longer
>> used for sending requests to remote hosts.  However, the downcall
>> socket is still bound to INADDR_ANY.
>> 
>> Thus a remote host can inject data on this socket since it is an
>> unconnected UDP socket listening for RPC replies.  Thanks to f113db52,
>> the port number of this socket is no longer controlled by a command
>> line option, making it difficult to firewall.
>> 
>> We have demonstrated that data injection on this socket can result in
>> a DoS by causing rpc.statd to consume CPU and log bandwidth, but so
>> far we have not found a breach.
>> 
>> To prevent unwanted data injection, bind this socket to the loopback
>> address.
>> 
>> BugLink: https://bugzilla.linux-nfs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Committed..

Do you want to close out bz 177, or shall I?  Or we can wait for the next nfs-utils release (1.2.5?) to mark it FIXED.

> steved.
> 
>> ---
>> 
>> Confirmed that reboot recovery still works, and that data injection
>> is no longer possible.  This is an updated and final version of this
>> patch.
>> 
>> utils/statd/rmtcall.c |    2 +-
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/utils/statd/rmtcall.c b/utils/statd/rmtcall.c
>> index 0e52fe2..4ecb03c 100644
>> --- a/utils/statd/rmtcall.c
>> +++ b/utils/statd/rmtcall.c
>> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ statd_get_socket(void)
>> 
>> 		memset(&sin, 0, sizeof(sin));
>> 		sin.sin_family = AF_INET;
>> -		sin.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY;
>> +		sin.sin_addr.s_addr = htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK);
>> 
>> 		if (bindresvport(sockfd, &sin) < 0) {
>> 			xlog(D_GENERAL, "%s: can't bind to reserved port",
>> 
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux