> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Trond Myklebust > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2011 4:13 AM > To: Jim Rees > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; peter honeyman > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 22/25] pnfsblock: note written INVAL areas for layoutcommit > > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 14:40 -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > > From: Fred Isaman <iisaman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > [SQUASHME: pnfs: blocklayout: port block layout code] > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ? This is from [PATCH 87/89] SQUASHME: pnfs: blocklayout: port block layout code, which was a large patch that made necessary change to fix up broken block layout code since last merge window. Yes, I agree the title is misleading. Will remove it from the commit log. Thanks, Tao > > > > > > +int mark_for_commit(struct pnfs_block_extent *be, > > + sector_t offset, sector_t length); > > This is an externally visible function, so it needs a prefix. Will do it. Thanks. > > -- > Trond Myklebust > Linux NFS client maintainer > > NetApp > Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx > www.netapp.com > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{��w��� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
