On Jul 26, 2011, at 10:02 PM, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 09:23 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-07-27 at 08:57 +0800, Ian Kent wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-07-26 at 17:13 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>> >>>> On 07/26/2011 10:50 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Jul 26, 2011, at 2:29 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> From: Ian Kent <raven@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> The IPv6 client functions clntudp6_bufcreate(), clntudp6_create and >>>>>> clnttcp6_create and the server functions svcudp6_bufcreate(), >>>>>> svctcp6_create() and svcudp6_create() are not included in the library >>>>>> whe libtirpc is built. >>>>> >>>>> Are these part of the libtirpc standard API? I'm not sure why we would need them if, say, Solaris does not support these. >>>> It appears they are not since they are not mentioned the man pages..... >>>> But, at least in the autofs code, they are expected >>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711956#c0 >>>> >>>> Ian, where else are these routines defined? >>> >>> Now that I look I can't find the original source tar that was used for >>> libtirpc, thought I had it. >> >> Found what I had. >> >> AFAICT what I think was the original source doesn't have any IPv6 code >> that I can see. >> >> Worse, these functions were excluded with the "#ifdef INET6_NOT_USED" >> macro as far back as libtirpc version 0.1.5 so, my bad, sorry. >> >>> >>> The story is that long ago when I changed autofs to use libtirpc (to >>> make it ready for IPv6) I found these functions in the source and they >>> were (obviously) the IPv6 counterparts for the corresponding IPv4 >>> functions which I was already using, so I used them. It took me quite a >>> while to realize my code wasn't working and then I found that somewhere >>> along the line they have been excluded, oops! >>> >>> If there are to be no IPv6 counterparts for the corresponding IPv4 >>> functions which functions should I use then? >> >> So what can I use? >> >> It seems to me that these functions would be useful for people porting >> code that uses the corresponding IPv4 functions so could we define them >> please. At some point someone must have had that same idea .... > > Found one more thing that looks relevant, these functions were defined > in glibc in 2000-01-23 so they may be used by others as well. I checked in glibc 2.7 (though not thoroughly) and did not find them. > >> >>> >>>> >>>> steved >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Steve Dickson <steved@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> src/rpc_soc.c | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/src/rpc_soc.c b/src/rpc_soc.c >>>>>> index c678429..584ac71 100644 >>>>>> --- a/src/rpc_soc.c >>>>>> +++ b/src/rpc_soc.c >>>>>> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ clnttcp_create(raddr, prog, vers, sockp, sendsz, recvsz) >>>>>> >>>>>> /* IPv6 version of clnt*_*create */ >>>>>> >>>>>> -#ifdef INET6_NOT_USED >>>>>> +#ifdef INET6 >>>>>> >>>>>> CLIENT * >>>>>> clntudp6_bufcreate(raddr, prog, vers, wait, sockp, sendsz, recvsz) >>>>>> @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ svcraw_create() >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> /* IPV6 version */ >>>>>> -#ifdef INET6_NOT_USED >>>>>> +#ifdef INET6 >>>>>> SVCXPRT * >>>>>> svcudp6_bufcreate(fd, sendsz, recvsz) >>>>>> int fd; >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 1.7.6 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> Magic Quadrant for Content-Aware Data Loss Prevention >>>>>> Research study explores the data loss prevention market. Includes in-depth >>>>>> analysis on the changes within the DLP market, and the criteria used to >>>>>> evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these DLP solutions. >>>>>> http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51385063/ >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Libtirpc-devel mailing list >>>>>> Libtirpc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libtirpc-devel >>>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Got Input? Slashdot Needs You. >>>> Take our quick survey online. Come on, we don't ask for help often. >>>> Plus, you'll get a chance to win $100 to spend on ThinkGeek. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/slashdot-survey >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Libtirpc-devel mailing list >>>> Libtirpc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libtirpc-devel >>> >> > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
