On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 18:25:07 +0200 Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@xxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 21 June 2011, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:00:57 -0400 > > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:10:41AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > > /srv/www \-sync,rw server @trusted @external(ro) > > > > +/foo 2001:321:9:e54::/64(rw) 192.168.1.0/24(rw) > > > > > > (Any reason for that particular example address? Just curious.) > > > > > > --b. > > > > Nope -- pulled that out of my nether regions. > > To make it perfect you could use address blocks reserved for > documentation. For example > 2001:DB8::/32 > and > 192.0.2.0/24 > > see rfc 3849 and 5737 > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3849 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5737 > > cu, > Rudi Good idea. I'll change those and respin the patch. Thanks, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
