Re: What is proper kernel tree to develop against?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 03:49:38PM -0400, Weston Andros Adamson wrote:
> 
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 3:03 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 02:52:19PM -0400, Jim Rees wrote:
> >> Ben Greear wrote:
> >> 
> >>  What kernel tree should I use to develop NFS & RPC patches
> >>  for possible upstream acceptance?
> >> 
> >> I think for the stuff you're doing it would just be the upstream git tree at
> >> kernel.org.  Note that nfs-utils is separate.
> >> 
> >> Has anyone pointed you to the wiki?  I think it answers many of these
> >> questions, although it seems heavily slanted towards pnfs.
> >> 
> >> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
> > 
> > It would be nice to reorganize the wiki, especially that top page.
> > 
> > I'd kind of like linux-nfs.org to just point to some page on the wiki
> > some day.
> 
> I've actually signed up to revamp linux-nfs.org.  I'll begin work on that very soon (after bakeathon and my vacation).

OK, good!

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux