On 2011-05-23 07:38, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 02:57 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> With the objects layout security model we have object capabilities
>> that are associated with the layout ad we anticipate that the server
>> will issue a cb_layoutrecall for any setattr that changes security
>> related attributes (user/group/mode/acl) or truncates the file.
>> Therefore, the client returns the layout in advance to avoid the
>> extra layout recall.
>>
>
> This looks like the wrong text. It belongs to that other patch.
Hmm, looks like a pilot error... thanks!
Benny
>
> The title and actual patch do match
>
> Boaz
>> [get rid of ds_[rw]size]
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h
>> index 87694ca..66e031f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs_sb.h
>> @@ -143,6 +143,7 @@ struct nfs_server {
>> filesystem */
>> struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *pnfs_curr_ld; /* Active layout driver */
>> struct rpc_wait_queue roc_rpcwaitq;
>> + void *pnfs_ld_data; /* Per-mount data */
>>
>> /* the following fields are protected by nfs_client->cl_lock */
>> struct rb_root state_owners;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
