On 05/23/2011 03:01 AM, Benny Halevy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 0f59802..d39fcca 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -1064,6 +1064,7 @@ pnfs_ld_write_done(struct nfs_write_data *data)
>
> if (!data->pnfs_error) {
> pnfs_set_layoutcommit(data);
> + memset(&data->task, 0, sizeof(data->task));
What?
We used this data task to come here. See: objlayout.c::objlayout_read/write_done()
why do you think it is invalid?
> data->mds_ops->rpc_call_done(&data->task, data);
> data->mds_ops->rpc_release(data);
> return 0;
> @@ -1113,6 +1114,7 @@ pnfs_ld_read_done(struct nfs_read_data *data)
>
> if (!data->pnfs_error) {
> __nfs4_read_done_cb(data);
> + memset(&data->task, 0, sizeof(data->task));
Same here this is called on the task thread
> data->mds_ops->rpc_call_done(&data->task, data);
> data->mds_ops->rpc_release(data);
> return 0;
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
