On 05/19/2011 11:38 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 23:10 +0400, Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
A client sends offset to MDS as it was seen by DS. As result,
file size after copy is only half of original file size in case
of 2 DS.
Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Gusev<gusev.vitaliy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
index be79dc9..790eb1d 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4filelayout.c
@@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ filelayout_set_layoutcommit(struct nfs_write_data *wdata)
wdata->res.verf->committed == NFS_FILE_SYNC)
return;
+ wdata->args.offset = wdata->mds_offset;
pnfs_set_layoutcommit(wdata);
dprintk("%s ionde %lu pls_end_pos %lu\n", __func__, wdata->inode->i_ino,
(unsigned long) wdata->lseg->pls_end_pos);
Err... Shouldn't we rather be fixing pnfs_set_layoutcommit() to use the
mds_offset instead of hacking args.offset?
I thought about it... pnfs_set_layoutcommit is a generic code for all
type of layouts, but mds_offset is set only for file layout.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html