Re: Performance Issue with multiple dataserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



You sent this message as a reply to an unrelated message, which is
confusing to those of us with threaded mail readers.

On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 05:24:45PM +0530, Taousif_Ansari@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I have done pNFS setup with single Dataserver and Two Dataserver and ran the IOzone tool on both, I found that the performance with multiple dataservers is less than the performance with single dataservers.

What are you using as the server, and what as the client?

--b.

> 
> Here are some numbers, which were captured by the IOzone tool.
> 
> 
> 							  4	  8	 16	 32	 64	 128	 256	 512	1024	<== Record Length in KB
> With Single Dataserver:
> Read operation for file size 1 MB-		66415	66359	63630	70358	86223	70256	66047	66068	68489	<== IO kB/sec
> Write operation for file size 1 MB-		18827	16920	18846	17039	18896	17009	17173	19206	17947	<== IO kB/sec
> 
> With Two Dataservers :
> Read operation for file size 1 MB-		36882	381198	38150	38084	38749	33663	34398	37313	37847	<== IO kB/sec
> Write operation for file size 1 MB-		5461	4661	5586	4870	5227	4922	4214	5572	4658	<== IO kB/sec
> 
> 
> Can somebody tell me What could be the issue....
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux