On Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200, BjÃrn JACKE <bj@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off: > > What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remember > > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been > > cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are? > > > > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch > > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or > > another. > > after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or > minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see > NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too. > I updated richaclv23 branch at http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kvaneesh/linux-richacl.git;a=summary which is rebased against latest linus tree. The changes pass richacl test against local file system. I am yet to test richacl on NFS client. Once i get the results i will repost the series again. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
