Re: [RFC 0/1] SUNRPC: dynamic rpc_slot allocator for TCP

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 3, 2011, at 4:13 PM, Andy Adamson wrote:

> 
> On May 3, 2011, at 4:06 PM, Chuck Lever wrote:
> 
>> Hi-
>> 
>> On May 2, 2011, at 9:40 PM, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> 
>>> I would appreciate comments on this patch. I've done a small amount of testing
>>> where I've set the /proc/sys/sunrpc/tcp_slot_table_entries to 2, and watched
>>> the dynamic allocator increase it to 3. I have a 10G test system being
>>> configured.
>> 
>> For TCP transports, then, the effective slot table size varies between the tcp_slot_table_entries setting and the estimated number of RPCs that can fit in the TCP window?  
> 
> Yes.
> 
>> What happens when the TCP window shrinks such that fewer RPCs can fit than are allowed by the tcp_slot_table_entries setting?
> 
> We don't shrink the rpc_slot table size. The idea being that if the TCP hits size X then shrinks to size X-n, there is a good chance that it will get back to size X. In the worst case, this is still better than a hard configured 'to large' slot table size.

Seems to me that we wouldn't need the tcp_slot_table_entries setting at all, then.  Always start at 2 and it will adjust itself as needed.  Unless we find we need a hard upper bound in some cases.

>> Have you done performance testing with loopback mounts (ie server and client on the same machine, mounting over the "lo" interface)?  As I recall this was the test case that Trond found worked poorly when we boosted the tcp_slot_table_entries setting to default to a 64 entry slot table.
> 
> No, not yet. I'll add this to the planned testing.  So having way too many default rpc_slots is bad? I could test by starting with a default of 2 slots and seeing how many are needed.

Apparently there was a problem with having too many slots, but I was never clear what that problem might be.  The report was only poor performance on loopback NFS mounts.

-- 
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux