On 2011-04-27 21:58, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 21:52 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: >> On 2011-04-27 17:16, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 07:50 +0300, Benny Halevy wrote: >>>> On 2011-04-25 17:11, Chuck Lever wrote: >>>>> Hey all- >>>>> >>>>> So what are we going to do when adding NFSv4.2 to this mix? Will we >>>>> then have to freeze both the NFSv4.1 and NFSv4.0 procedure API in the >>>>> kernel? Seems painful. >>>> >>>> Good question. >>>> How about changing the stat pseudo-file format to include an op >>>> identifier along with its respective counter, printing a line per op? >>> >>> We already have that in /proc/self/mountstats >>> >>> >> >> You mean /proc/self/status? > > No. So can you please explain what you meant by the /proc/self/mountstats example? This is what I see: $ head -3 /proc/self/mountstats device rootfs mounted on / with fstype rootfs device /proc mounted on /proc with fstype proc device /sys mounted on /sys with fstype sysfs Benny -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
