On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:17:03AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 05:21:57PM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > >> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> > >> >> I'll start test of this patch, and see what happens. > >> > > >> > OK. Although filp slabs are still slightly increasing (I'm not sure yet > >> > whether this is leak of filp on system). But watching before/after > >> > patch, the graph of filp slabs is clearly different. > >> > > >> > As far as I can say patches are fine. > >> > >> slightly increasing was stopped at 2200-2300. filp leak seems to be fixed. > > > > Another thing to check is whether you can always unmount the exported > > filesystem on the server after running your test. So something like: > > > > service nfs stop > > unmount /exports/fs > > > > should always succeed; if you get an inexplicable EBUSY on the final > > unmount then we likely still have a leak someplace. > > It succeeded. Good, thanks.--b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
