On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 08:43:28AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > Currently, the client uses FILE_SYNC whenever it's writing less than or > equal data to the wsize with O_DIRECT. This is a problem though if we > have a bunch of small iovec's batched up in a single writev call. The > client will iterate over them and do a single FILE_SYNC WRITE for each. > > Instead, change the code to do unstable writes when we'll need to do > multiple WRITE RPC's in order to satisfy the request. While we're at > it, optimize away the allocation of commit_data when we aren't going > to use it anyway. > > I tested this with a program that allocates 256 page-sized and aligned > chunks of data into an array of iovecs, opens a file with O_DIRECT, and > then passes that into a writev call 128 times. Without this patch, it > took 5m16s to run on my (admittedly crappy) test rig. With this patch, > it finished in 7.5s. > > Trond, would it be reasonable to take this patch as a stopgap measure > until your overhaul of the O_DIRECT code is finished? To me your patch looks like a good quick fix for this issue. I'm not actually sure how Trond's re-architecture is supposed to look like given that pagecache writeback and DIO writes are pretty fundamentally driven, but I can't image a design that wouldn't allow for a similar quirk on when to use stable writes and when not. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html