Re: Prioritizing readdirplus/getattr/lookup

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--- On Fri, 4/8/11, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:49 PM, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> 
> > I just got myself edjumicated on smp_affinity, and now
> > I'm able to achieve 99% CPU usage by 8 nfsd processes on 8
> > cores on a read-only, fully-cached workload, with ksoftirqd
> > processes only using 1% CPU per core.
> > 
> > Unfortunately, this doesn't help the "ls -l" speed.
> 
> Serving NFS files is generally not CPU intensive.  The
> problem may be lock contention on the server, but that's
> about as far as my expertise goes.

In that case the test workload was fully cached in memory, so I'm not completely surprised.

Andrew


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux