Re: problem with nfs latency during high IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chuck Lever wrote:

  > I was wondering what is the minimum number that it is safe to use? I'm
    sure that you have already dealt with the side-effects/collateral
    damages of this action, I don't want to fix a problem creating another
    one..
  
  As I said before, you can set it to 1, and that will mean background
  flushing kicks in at 1% of your client's physical memory.

I think 5 is the minimum for dirty_ratio, although this doesn't seem to be
documented anywhere.  If you want to set it lower, you have to use
dirty_bytes instead of dirty_ratio.  See the commit message here:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/11/23/160

Documentation is in Documentation/sysctl/vm.txt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux