On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:45 -0400, j223yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 'req' is already dereferenced in
> 'struct rpc_xprt *xprt = req->rq_xprt;',
> but check again later in the function.
> The patch removes these redundant checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinqiu Yang <crindy646@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> xprt.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpt/xprt.c b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c 2011-03-16 00:10:08.764164573 -0400
> +++ b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c 2011-03-16 02:33:38.559164414 -0400
> @@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ int xprt_reserve_xprt(struct rpc_task *t
> goto out_sleep;
> }
> xprt->snd_task = task;
> - if (req) {
> - req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> - req->rq_ntrans++;
> - }
> + req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> + req->rq_ntrans++;
> return 1;
>
> out_sleep:
> @@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ out_sleep:
> task->tk_pid, xprt);
> task->tk_timeout = 0;
> task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
> - if (req && req->rq_ntrans)
> + if (req->rq_ntrans)
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->resend, task, NULL);
> else
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->sending, task, NULL);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
You already sent hunk 1 in a different patch, and I've already applied
that to the nfs-for-2.6.39 branch. Could you therefore please resend
this patch with just the second hunk.
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
