Thanks Benny, that's awesome :) -->Andy On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I merged these patches in the pnfs-submit-wave3-rev2 branch > in git://linux-nfs.org/~bhalevy/linux-pnfs.git > and then your 15 patch series that's zero diff from this one > as pnfs-submit-wave3-rev3 > > pnfs-submit-wave3 now points to pnfs-submit-wave3-rev3 > > Fred is working on preparing wave4 on top of wave3 > But until we're finished with that and then the rest of the tree on top of it > I forked pnfs-submit and downward from wave3 and it has not changed. > > The tree at this point is structured like this: > > nfsd41-all > pnfs-submit-wave3 > pnfs-submit > pnfs > ... > > Benny > > On 2011-02-04 23:33, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> The wave3 code addresses pNFS file layout data server connection, data server >> READ I/O and recovery of failed data server READs through the MDS. >> >> I did not see the pnfs-submit-wave3 branch on benny's tree, so I created my >> own for the meantime. >> I cloned the nfsd41-all from git://linux-nfs.org/~bhalevy/linux-pnfs.git >> which is the base for the pnfs-submit branch. >> I then applied the wave3 patches from benny's pnfs-submit branch, >> and then the changes. >> >> git://linux-nfs.org/projects/andros/benny-linux-pnfs.git >> branch andros-pnfs-submit-wave3 contains the result. >> >> ======================================================================== >> Please review the changes - I want to submit to Trond/Christoph next week. >> ======================================================================== >> >> These patches are in the first 12 in the pnfs-submit tree and are the original >> "wave3" patches. >> >> 0001-pnfs-submit-wave3-lseg-refcounting.patch >> 0002-pnfs_submit-add-data-server-session-to-nfs4_setup_se.patch >> 0003-pnfs_submit-update-nfs4_async_handle_error-for-data-.patch >> 0004-pnfs_submit-update-state-renewal-for-data-servers.patch >> 0005-pnfs_submit-wave3-pageio-helpers.patch >> 0006-pnfs_submit-wave3-associate-layout-segment-with-nfs_.patch >> 0007-pnfs_submit-filelayout-policy-operations.patch >> 0008-pnfs_submit-filelayout-i-o-helpers.patch >> 0009-pnfs_submit-wave3-generic-read.patch >> 0010-pnfs_submit-filelayout-read.patch >> 0011-pnfs_submit-increase-NFS_MAX_FILE_IO_SIZE.patch >> 0012-pnfs_submit-enforce-requested-DS-only-pNFS-role.patch >> >> The rest are the wave3 changes. >> >> Summary of changes; >> ------------------- >> >> 1) The file layoutdriver now specifies it's own rpc_call_prepare and >> rpc_call_done callbacks for READ. >> >> filelayout_read_prepare: >> - Uses nfs41_setup_sequence so we do not need to change nfs4_setup_sequence(). >> >> filelayout_read_done >> - Add a read_done_cb function to nfs_read_data that calls nfs_read_done_cb for >> NFS READs and filelayout_read_done_cb for data server READs. >> - filelayout_read_done_cb has its own async error handler so we do not need to change nfs4_async_handle_error() >> >> 2) DS/MDS dual role now allows for sessions used as a data server to be reused >> as an MDS or NFSv41 mount. >> - We don't ask for the DS role on data server EXCHANGE_ID >> - We don't strip any roles returned by the server. >> - If a session is in use as a DS role, and the client subsequently mounts the >> same server as either an MDS or NON_PNFS mount, the same session can be used >> provided the existing exchange flags allow it. >> >> 3) We always send a zero READ/WRITE stateid seqid. This is required for >> data servers, and there is no advantage to not doing it for MDS or NON_PNFS >> mounts. >> >> 4) We mark the deviceid as invalid upon any data server connection failure >> and print out a kernel message. >> This in turn marks any layout that tries to use the devicid as failed for >> both IOMODE_READ and IOMODE_RW. Inodes without layouts will still send >> a layoutget. If the resultant layout uses the marked deviceid, it will be >> marked as failed for both iomodes. All I/O will go through the MDS until >> a client reboot or a CB_LAYOUTRECALL ALL or FSID removes all layouts that >> refer to the deviceid, which removes the deviceid. >> >> 5) Our new file layout async error handler only recovers from session >> related errors, or grace/delay errors. All other errors including >> NFS4ERR_EXPIRED or NFS4ERR_STALE_CLIENTID result in marking the layout as >> failed for IOMODE_READ and I/O is retried through the MDS. >> >> 6) Fred's lock inversion patches, and the request by Trond to not reference >> a layout segment on dirty pages held in the cache changed the layout >> segment reference counting. >> >> There are a couple of small issues I'm still investigating. Trond and Fred >> have done an initial review. >> >> -->Andy >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html