Hi, Isn't by mount a plausible way to select for pnfs independent of debugging? Is it assured that a client administrator would never reasonably wish to do this? Matt ----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Such a mount option could be useful for dealing with buggy servers > (pnfs-wise) so you > > could mount one server with pnfs and another without. > > You can find ways around that. Just use 2 clients: one with pnfs > switched on, and one with it off. > > I really don't want to introduce mount options upstream unless they > are > useful in the long term. One off usefulness does not pass that test. > > -- > Trond Myklebust > Linux NFS client maintainer > > NetApp > Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx > www.netapp.com > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Matt Benjamin The Linux Box 206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 http://linuxbox.com tel. 734-761-4689 fax. 734-769-8938 cel. 734-216-5309 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
