On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Yes. The fix I sent out was a call to invalidate_kernel_vmap_range(),
> which takes care of invalidating the cache prior to a virtual address
> read.
>
> My question was specifically about the write through the regular kernel
> mapping: according to Russell and my reading of the cachetlb.txt
> documentation, flush_dcache_page() is only guaranteed to have an effect
> on page cache pages.
I don't think that should ever matter. It's not like the hardware can
know whether it's a dcache page or not.
And if the sw implementation cares, it's doing something really odd.
But who knows - there's a lot of crap out there, and people sometimes
do really odd things to work around the brokenness of a VIVT cache
with aliases.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
