On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:26:05PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 03:47:52PM -0500, bfields wrote:
> > From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Once a sunrpc cache entry is non-NEGATIVE, we should be replacing it
> > (and allowing any concurrent users to destroy it on last put) instead of
> > trying to update it in place.
>
> Or the following seems simpler.
>
> (And I was thinking it was necessary to ensure that the right thing
> happened to the cached xprt->xpt_auth_cache entry--though on a second
> look I see that sunrpc_cache_update also expires the replaced entry
> immediately. Still, this seems simpler if it also works.)
Eh, on third thoughts: we probably do want a real negative entry created
in the cache, so I think the original patch was correct!
--b.
>
> --b.
>
> commit 20771de3185bf0031aa767d3b19f3e744a465a0c
> Author: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri Dec 24 14:03:38 2010 -0500
>
> svcrpc: modifying valid sunrpc cache entries is racy
>
> Once a sunrpc cache entry is non-NEGATIVE, we shouldn't attempt to
> modify it in place. Otherwise someone referencing the ip_map we're
> modifying here could try to use the m_client just as we're putting the
> last reference.
>
> Instead, just set the expiry time so it expires immediately.
>
> The bug should only be seen by users of the legacy nfsd interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c b/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c
> index a04ac91..5edc147 100644
> --- a/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c
> +++ b/net/sunrpc/svcauth_unix.c
> @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ struct auth_domain *auth_unix_lookup(struct net *net, struct in6_addr *addr)
> return NULL;
>
> if ((ipm->m_client->addr_changes - ipm->m_add_change) >0) {
> - if (test_and_set_bit(CACHE_NEGATIVE, &ipm->h.flags) == 0)
> - auth_domain_put(&ipm->m_client->h);
> + ipm->h.expiry_time = 0;
> rv = NULL;
> } else {
> rv = &ipm->m_client->h;
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
