The following patches implement secinfo_no_name and update secinfo to meet a 4.1 requirement. I'll apply them for 2.6.38 if nobody sees a problem. They look simple enough. But I don't have a test for them. So they're probably wrong. Two pynfs41 tests would do it: - send PUTROOTFH+SECINFO_NO_NAME, check that you get back a legal result. - send PUTROOTFH+SECINFO+GETFH, and/or PUTROOTFH+SECINFO_NO_NAME+GETFH, check that the GETFH returns NOFILEHANDLE. I'll get around to it some day if nobody volunteers. There are plenty of little things like this that could use doing or testing before server-side 4.1 is correct; see: http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/Server_4.0_and_4.1_issues --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
