Re: [PATCH_V3 1/7] NFS dont free shared socket on backchannel put xprt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:44:58PM -0500, Andy Adamson wrote:
> 
> On Dec 14, 2010, at 1:19 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 03:19:39PM -0500, Andy Adamson wrote:
> >>Fixes this bug:
> >>fedora-64 kernel: Invoking bc_svc_procass()
> >>fedora-64 kernel: nfs_callback_authenticate SVC_DROP
> >>fedora-64 kernel: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> >>dereference at 0000000000000018 IP: [<ffffffffa0156140>]
> >>svc_sock_free+0x32/0x56 [sunrpc]
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>---
> >>fs/nfs/callback.c               |    3 +++
> >>include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h |    1 +
> >>net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c           |    3 ++-
> >>3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback.c b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> >>index 93a8b3b..023a9eb 100644
> >>--- a/fs/nfs/callback.c
> >>+++ b/fs/nfs/callback.c
> >>@@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ nfs41_callback_up(struct svc_serv *serv,
> >>struct rpc_xprt *xprt)
> >>	serv->bc_xprt = bc_xprt;
> >>	xprt->bc_serv = serv;
> >>
> >>+	/* socket is shared with the fore channel */
> >>+	set_bit(XPT_SHARE_SOCK, &bc_xprt->xpt_flags);
> >>+
> >>	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&serv->sv_cb_list);
> >>	spin_lock_init(&serv->sv_cb_lock);
> >>	init_waitqueue_head(&serv->sv_cb_waitq);
> >>diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> >>b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> >>index aea0d43..600c669 100644
> >>--- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> >>+++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_xprt.h
> >>@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct svc_xprt {
> >>#define	XPT_DETACHED	10		/* detached from tempsocks list */
> >>#define XPT_LISTENER	11		/* listening endpoint */
> >>#define XPT_CACHE_AUTH	12		/* cache auth info */
> >>+#define XPT_SHARE_SOCK	13		/* fore and back channel share socket */
> >>
> >>	struct svc_pool		*xpt_pool;	/* current pool iff queued */
> >>	struct svc_serv		*xpt_server;	/* service for transport */
> >>diff --git a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> >>index ea2ff78..8c4d9ad 100644
> >>--- a/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> >>+++ b/net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c
> >>@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static void svc_xprt_free(struct kref *kref)
> >>	if (test_bit(XPT_CACHE_AUTH, &xprt->xpt_flags))
> >>		svcauth_unix_info_release(xprt);
> >>	put_net(xprt->xpt_net);
> >>-	xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_free(xprt);
> >>+	if (!test_bit(XPT_SHARE_SOCK, &xprt->xpt_flags))
> >>+		xprt->xpt_ops->xpo_free(xprt);
> >
> >So when does the svc_xprt get freed if not here?
> 
> svc_sock_destroy frees the bc_xprt, called by svc_destroy on the
> serv->bc_xprt.

Can you remove the

	#if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
        	svc_sock_destroy(serv->bc_xprt);
	#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */

from svc_destroy instead?

> >And why is it OK to do
> >the put_net() and module_put() but not the xpo_free()?
> 
> svc_sock_create()  called only by nfs41_callback_up creates the
> bc_xprt. It calls svc_xprt_init which calls get_net(), so put_net is
> needed.
> 
> Hmmm. It looks like the module_put is also not needed - the matching
> module_get is in svc_create_xprt() which is not called for the
> NFSv4.1 callback service. (but is called for the NFSv4.0 callback
> service ... sheese).
> 
> I'll move the module_put so it is also not called when the
> XPT_SHARE_SOCK flag is set.

The xpt_net reference counting doesn't look right either.

I think we shouldn't need XPT_SHARE_SOCK if we just get the reference counting
on the svc_xprt right instead.

> 
> >
> >Something feels wrong here....
> 
> Yeah - how about naming the server back channel xprt (bc_xprt) the
> same as the client back channel xprt (bc_xprt)!!! How confusing is
> THAT! :)

Well, and it's also the name of a field in svc_serv.  If nothing else, would
you mind renaming that to sv_bc_xprt?

--b.

> 
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> -->Andy
> 
> >
> >--b.
> >
> >>	module_put(owner);
> >>}
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>1.6.6
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
> >>nfs" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> >linux-nfs" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux