On Dec 7, 2010, at 4:15 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > (I see AUTH_SYS as a different issue. It's unfortunately true that > AUTH_SYS has effectively turned out to be required-to-implement even if > it wasn't meant to be, so maybe the spec's out of line with reality > there; but I haven't heard of that causing any practical > problems--whereas "why does ls show all users as nobody after an upgrade > to NFSv4" is a FAQ.) > > --b. If everyone were to adopt this approach to solve the FAQ, then wouldn't we want it to be specified to make sure that interoperability was maximized? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
