On 12/09/2010 04:23 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > > On Dec 9, 2010, at 5:12 AM, Stefan Bader wrote: > >> On 12/09/2010 01:19 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Hi Stefan- >>> >>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 3:35 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 8, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 18:30 +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24302 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: >>>>>> >>>>>> What |Removed |Added >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> >>>>>> >> Component|Other |NFS >>>>>> AssignedTo|fs_other@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx |rg >>>>>> | >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --- Comment #8 from Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> 2010-12-08 18:30:32 --- OK, I reassigned it to NFS. If that was wrong >>>>>> then at least the NFS guys should be able to help point things in the >>>>>> right direction. >>>>> >>>>> <Switching to email interface. Please do not edit the bugzilla entry >>>>> directly, since that will lose the above Cc information> >> >> Missed to read the above, so I have to duplicate things a bit, sorry. Removed >> the bugzilla cc, so the report does not get spammed. >> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Chuck, >>>>> >>>>> Stefan appears to be hitting a panic in the nfs_umount() call from >>>>> nfs_walk_authlist(). Can you take a look, please? >>>> >>>> Recv'd. I'll have a look. >>> >>> Apologies in advance for the attachment. There are a few other clean ups >>> that can be done, but this seems to be the minimal fix. Please try this and >>> let us know if it addresses your panic. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The faulty commit went in a while back, so this patch is probably appropriate >>> for stable kernels (back to 2.6.31, where this was likely introduced). >>> >> >> I can confirm that this was the root cause of the crash. The sha referenced as >> the causing commit, got in with a 2.6.32-rc so I added the stable info >> accordingly. I also added my tested-by and slightly modified the bug reference >> format (Chuck, I hope this is ok). > > Looks good to me. I assume, since Trond still owns the kernel.org bugzilla, that he will close this loop? Let me know if I need to do anything else. > Actually someone spotted that the second array_size should probably use mnt_procedures3 instead of mnt_procedures. They happen to be the same size, so testing is ok. -Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
