Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Bian
>
> On Nov 29, 2010, at 9:05 PM, Bian Naimeng wrote:
>
>>
>> Steve Dickson wrote:
>>> On 11/29/2010 09:45 AM, Chuck Lever wrote:
>>>> On Nov 25, 2010, at 5:07 AM, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We should return the errno that was set before po_destroy,
>>>>> rather than the errno that was set at po_destroy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because the po_destroy function don't affect the return value,
>>>>> this patch just revert the saved errno after po_destroy.
>>>> The only library function used in po_destroy() is free(3).
>>>> Does free(3) change the value of errno?
>>> Looking at the man page and taking a look a the
>>> glibc code it appears the answer is no. free(3)
>>> does not set errno.
>>>
>>> Bian, what was the problem you were seeing that this
>>> patch fixed?
>>>
>> Actually, there's no problem now. But this's not a good style, po_destroy
>> maybe change the errno later on such as adding a printf.
>> So if somebady want modify the po_destroy, he must be careful of it. :)
>>
>> And, i don't think it's a good idea that explicitly set errno, it maybe make
>> some trouble in the future. It's better returning error in nfs_do_mount_v3v2,
>> or save the error in a input parameter. :)
>
> Perhaps it isn't good style, but I'd rather see all of stropts.c updated to pass errno as an explicit parameter than to have it changed piecemeal. I agree that we run into trouble everywhere in mount with errno.
>
> I think this particular patch is unnecessary until we have a need for it. Basically it confuses a reviewer who sees that we've gone to the trouble here to save and restore errno, but nowhere else, and besides po_destroy() doesn't even alter errno. Why are we bothering?
>
Well, it's okay to me.
Thanks
Bian
>>> steved.
>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bian Naimeng <biannm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> utils/mount/stropts.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/utils/mount/stropts.c b/utils/mount/stropts.c
>>>>> index 50a1a2a..d554877 100644
>>>>> --- a/utils/mount/stropts.c
>>>>> +++ b/utils/mount/stropts.c
>>>>> @@ -592,7 +592,7 @@ static int nfs_do_mount_v3v2(struct nfsmount_info *mi,
>>>>> struct sockaddr *sap, socklen_t salen)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct mount_options *options = po_dup(mi->options);
>>>>> - int result = 0;
>>>>> + int result = 0, save = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!options) {
>>>>> errno = ENOMEM;
>>>>> @@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static int nfs_do_mount_v3v2(struct nfsmount_info *mi,
>>>>> result = nfs_sys_mount(mi, options);
>>>>>
>>>>> out_fail:
>>>>> + save = errno;
>>>>> po_destroy(options);
>>>>> + errno = save;
>>>>> return result;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -673,7 +675,7 @@ static int nfs_do_mount_v4(struct nfsmount_info *mi,
>>>>> struct sockaddr *sap, socklen_t salen)
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct mount_options *options = po_dup(mi->options);
>>>>> - int result = 0;
>>>>> + int result = 0, save = 0;
>>>>>
>>>>> if (!options) {
>>>>> errno = ENOMEM;
>>>>> @@ -724,7 +726,9 @@ static int nfs_do_mount_v4(struct nfsmount_info *mi,
>>>>> result = nfs_sys_mount(mi, options);
>>>>>
>>>>> out_fail:
>>>>> + save = errno;
>>>>> po_destroy(options);
>>>>> + errno = save;
>>>>> return result;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> 1.7.3.2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Regards
>> Bian Naimeng
>>
>
--
Regards
Bian Naimeng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
