On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 13:52 -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > The processes appeared to be waiting for state recovery to complete, but > your trace didn't contain any evidence that a state recovery thread was > running. To be clear, the trace was only that of blocked processes (echo w > /proc/sysrq-trigger). I'm not sure if we should have expected the state recovery thread to have been included (i.e. it was blocked too). > Did you over-edit the trace output, or was this really all? Other than the usual post-show-blocked-state output, yes, this really was all there was. What does the state recovery thread look like in the process table so that I can look for it next time? b.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part