Re: NFS4 clients cannot reclaim locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



----- "Trond Myklebust" <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Yup. That makes sense. Does the following patch help?
> 
> Cheers
>   Trond
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> NFSv4: Fix open recovery
> 
> From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> NFSv4 open recovery is currently broken: since we do not clear the
> state->flags states before attempting recovery, we end up with the
> 'can_open_cached()' function triggering. This again leads to no OPEN
> call
> being put on the wire.
> 
> Reported-by: Sachin Prabhu <sprabhu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> index 089da5b..01b4817 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> @@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ static int nfs4_open_recover(struct
> nfs4_opendata *opendata, struct nfs4_state *
>  	clear_bit(NFS_DELEGATED_STATE, &state->flags);
>  	smp_rmb();
>  	if (state->n_rdwr != 0) {
> +		clear_bit(NFS_O_RDWR_STATE, &state->flags);
>  		ret = nfs4_open_recover_helper(opendata, FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE,
> &newstate);
>  		if (ret != 0)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -1127,6 +1128,7 @@ static int nfs4_open_recover(struct
> nfs4_opendata *opendata, struct nfs4_state *
>  			return -ESTALE;
>  	}
>  	if (state->n_wronly != 0) {
> +		clear_bit(NFS_O_WRONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>  		ret = nfs4_open_recover_helper(opendata, FMODE_WRITE, &newstate);
>  		if (ret != 0)
>  			return ret;
> @@ -1134,6 +1136,7 @@ static int nfs4_open_recover(struct
> nfs4_opendata *opendata, struct nfs4_state *
>  			return -ESTALE;
>  	}
>  	if (state->n_rdonly != 0) {
> +		clear_bit(NFS_O_RDONLY_STATE, &state->flags);
>  		ret = nfs4_open_recover_helper(opendata, FMODE_READ, &newstate);
>  		if (ret != 0)
>  			return ret;
> 


Yes. The patch works. 

As expected, repeated open calls are made with claim-type set to NULL. For each of these calls, a NFS4ERR_GRACE is returned by the server as long as it is in Grace period. Once the grace period has completed, the open call succeeds, a new stateid is set and the write operation continues.

Thank You
Sachin Prabhu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux