On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 12:41 +0200, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote: > NFS_V4 works fine without RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 (even without CRYPTO). > This dependency was introduced in > > df486a2 (NFS: Fix the selection of security flavours in Kconfig) > > to fix a build failure as RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 was thought to be needed for > NFS_V4. The fix didn't work completely as NFS_V4 didn't enforce CRYPTO > and so the select on RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 didn't work in all situations (e.g. > arm/mx1_defconfig). > > This was rectified by > > 827e345 (SUNRPC: Fix the NFSv4 and RPCSEC_GSS Kconfig dependencies) > > but the magic for RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 introduced by df486a2 wasn't reverted. > > Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-KÃnig <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Hello, > > after Trond sent me the patch that later ended in 827e345702 I suggested > to fold the patch below into it[1], but without reaction and success as I > noticed just now. :-( > > Best regards > Uwe That's because you completely fail to justify why should we change the behaviour to suddenly make RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 optional for NFSv4. That has never been the case before. Trond -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
