Re: [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs: get layout in proper segments.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Base the LAYOUTGET arguments on the actual required byte ranges
> rather than asking for the whole file layout.
>
> Add a check in readpage_async_filler that the layout segment
> retrieved in pnfs_pageio_init_read still covers the current page
> and if not, try getting a new one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/nfs/file.c |    2 +-
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.c |   13 ++++++-------
>  fs/nfs/pnfs.h |   21 ++++++++-------------
>  fs/nfs/read.c |   17 ++++++++++++++++-
>  4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/file.c b/fs/nfs/file.c
> index b05c1ff..228f41e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
> @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ static int nfs_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
>
>        pnfs_update_layout(mapping->host,
>                           nfs_file_open_context(file),
> -                          0, NFS4_MAX_UINT64, IOMODE_RW,
> +                          pos, len, IOMODE_RW,
>                           &lseg);
>  start:
>        /*
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index e6261a3..de716f6 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -600,11 +600,10 @@ send_layoutget(struct inode *ino,
>                pnfs_layout_release(lo, NULL);
>                return -ENOMEM;
>        }
> -       lgp->args.minlength = NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
> +       lgp->args.minlength = PAGE_CACHE_SIZE -
> +                               (range->offset & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE-1));
>        lgp->args.maxcount = PNFS_LAYOUT_MAXSIZE;
> -       lgp->args.range.iomode = range->iomode;
> -       lgp->args.range.offset = 0;
> -       lgp->args.range.length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64;
> +       lgp->args.range = *range;
>        lgp->args.type = server->pnfs_curr_ld->id;
>        lgp->args.inode = ino;
>        lgp->lsegpp = lsegpp;
> @@ -1028,8 +1027,8 @@ _pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
>  {
>        struct pnfs_layout_range arg = {
>                .iomode = iomode,
> -               .offset = 0,
> -               .length = NFS4_MAX_UINT64,
> +               .offset = pos,
> +               .length = count,
>        };
>        struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(ino);
>        struct pnfs_layout_hdr *lo;
> @@ -1330,7 +1329,7 @@ pnfs_pageio_init_read(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
>        readahead_range(inode, pages, &loff, &count);
>
>        if (count > 0) {
> -               _pnfs_update_layout(inode, ctx, loff, count, IOMODE_READ,
> +               pnfs_update_layout(inode, ctx, loff, count, IOMODE_READ,


Why this change?  the pnfs_enabled_sb check has already been done at
the top of the function, hasn't it?


>                                    &pgio->pg_lseg);
>                if (!pgio->pg_lseg)
>                        return;
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index 81534aa..b666f53 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -188,19 +188,14 @@ static inline int pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino,
>        return 0;
>  }
>
> -static inline void pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
> -       struct nfs_open_context *ctx,
> -       loff_t pos, u64 count, enum pnfs_iomode access_type,
> -       struct pnfs_layout_segment **lsegpp)
> -{
> -       struct nfs_server *nfss = NFS_SERVER(ino);
> -
> -       if (pnfs_enabled_sb(nfss))
> -               _pnfs_update_layout(ino, ctx, pos, count, access_type, lsegpp);
> -       else {
> -               if (lsegpp)
> -                       *lsegpp = NULL;
> -       }
> +#define pnfs_update_layout(ino, ctx, pos, count, access_type, lsegpp) { \
> +       if (pnfs_enabled_sb(NFS_SERVER(ino))) { \
> +               dprintk("%s: updating %s layout pos %llu count %llu\n", __func__, \
> +                       (access_type) == IOMODE_READ ? "READ" : "WRITE", \
> +                       (unsigned long long)(pos), (unsigned long long)(count)); \
> +               _pnfs_update_layout(ino, ctx, pos, count, access_type, lsegpp); \
> +       } else \
> +               *lsegpp = NULL; \
>  }


Why this change?  I much prefer the inline version to the define, and
I thought that this was generally being pushed.


>
>  static inline int pnfs_get_write_status(struct nfs_write_data *data)
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
> index dde7996..36eef5e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/read.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
> @@ -121,12 +121,14 @@ int nfs_readpage_async(struct nfs_open_context *ctx, struct inode *inode,
>        LIST_HEAD(one_request);
>        struct nfs_page *new;
>        unsigned int len;
> +       loff_t pgoffs;
>        struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
>
>        len = nfs_page_length(page);
>        if (len == 0)
>                return nfs_return_empty_page(page);
> -       pnfs_update_layout(inode, ctx, 0, NFS4_MAX_UINT64, IOMODE_READ, &lseg);
> +       pgoffs = (loff_t)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +       pnfs_update_layout(inode, ctx, pgoffs, len, IOMODE_READ, &lseg);
>        new = nfs_create_request(ctx, inode, page, 0, len, lseg);
>        put_lseg(lseg);
>        if (IS_ERR(new)) {
> @@ -603,14 +605,27 @@ readpage_async_filler(void *data, struct page *page)
>  {
>        struct nfs_readdesc *desc = (struct nfs_readdesc *)data;
>        struct inode *inode = page->mapping->host;
> +       struct pnfs_layout_range *range;
>        struct nfs_page *new;
>        unsigned int len;
> +       loff_t pgoff;
>        int error;
>
>        len = nfs_page_length(page);
>        if (len == 0)
>                return nfs_return_empty_page(page);
>
> +       pgoff = (loff_t)page->index << PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> +       range = desc->pgio->pg_lseg ? &desc->pgio->pg_lseg->range : NULL;
> +       if (!range ||
> +           (range->offset > pgoff + len) ||
> +           (range->offset + range->length < pgoff)) {
> +               put_lseg(desc->pgio->pg_lseg);
> +               desc->pgio->pg_lseg = NULL;
> +               pnfs_update_layout(inode, desc->ctx, pgoff, len, IOMODE_READ,
> +                                  &desc->pgio->pg_lseg);
> +       }
> +
>        new = nfs_create_request(desc->ctx, inode, page, 0, len,
>                                 desc->pgio->pg_lseg);
>        if (IS_ERR(new))
> --


Wouldn't it be easier to just trim any returned layout to page
boundaries, and then pnfs_can_coalesce_requests will handle this
automatically.

Fred

> 1.7.2.3
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux