Re: [PATCH 0/9] sunrpc: Start making sunrpc work in containers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/20/2010 10:04 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 08:33:42PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>>> Looking forward to your feedback.
>>>
>>> What are you thinking of as a use-case for this?
>>
>> To make it possible run both NFS server and client in containers.
> 
> Could you describe that in user-visible terms?  (Currently if I create a
> new network namespace, what happens, and what will happen differently
> afterwards?)

This is not about the network namespace only I believe. E.g. the
nfsd filesystem is a filesystem already and shouldn't be tied to
any task-driven context.

E.g. as far as the net namespace part is concerned. First of all
the TCP/UDP socket used by transport will be per-namespace. User
will "feel" this for example by different routing and netfilter
rules applied to connections. Besides the rpc service sockets will
be per namespace as well.

>> Sure! The thing is that the full containerization of that stuff is
>> too many patches and I'm not sure that you and other maintainers wish
>> to review the 100-patch set in one go ;)
> 
> Well, if it's really all ready....
> 
> Better, though, would be an outline of the work to be done and what you
> expect to be working at the end.

The nearest plan is

1. Prepare the sunrpc layer to work in net namespaces
2. Make rpcpipefs and nfsd filesystems be mountable multiple times
3. Make support for multiple instances of the nfsd caches
4. Make suuport for multiple instances of the nfsd_serv

After this several NFSd-s can be used in containers (hopefully I
didn't miss anything).

Plans about the nfs client are much more obscure for now.

>> I want to find out what git tree to hack on and prepare small patch
>> sets making things step-by-step. This one is just the first in a row.
> 
> For the server side you can use
> 
> 	git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/linux.git nfsd-next
> 
> though generally the latest upstream will likely work as well.

OK, I will re-base the set onto the nfsd-next then.

> On a quick skim, those patches look fine (and brokenly up nicely for
> review, thanks).  My main concern is just being sure I understand where
> this all ends up.

Well, as far as I know the nfsd and sunrpc code the plan described
above should give us most of the work needed to containerize nfsd.

> --b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux