On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 01:24:51PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote: > However, on the longer run I'd like us to consider formalizing > the kABI for non-GPLed layout drivers. No. Non-GPLed drivers will have a very hard way to stand against the derived work clauses for some specificly written new code anyway, and if you haven't noticed yet there's no kABI in mainline anyway. > I think that this is a great selling point as it fully materializes the > extensibility of the layout-type / layout-driver design model. Drinking again? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
