is 'umount' asynchronous?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



While testing NFSv4 over TCPv6 on 2.6.36-rc3 + my srcaddr= patch today,
I noticed that I was getting 'busy' errors from umount if I closed a
file in a program and then had it immediately system("umount ...");

If I retry the umount a few times, it will start returning 'already unmounted'.
It took around 50-100ms (I was sleeping 50ms between umount attempts).

Is that expected behaviour?  Seems we never needed any retries and never
got 'busy' on 2.6.34 and earlier.

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux