Tigran, was there an actual panic or just this string of WARNINGs? Were there any ill effects for this warning? The reason I'm asking is that according to our latest analysis of the code the warning might be a red herring and it can happen in valid scenarios so we intend to remove it altogether in the revised pnfs-submit series. Thanks for reporting in any case! Benny On 2010-09-03 15:39, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote: > FYI > > kernel pnfs-all-2.6.35-2010.08-24 (git > fa5a03da84b02026396be0736288b3f4a8143ff2) > > > Regards, > Tigran. > > > > _______________________________________________ > NOTE: THIS LIST IS DEPRECATED. Please use linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > instead. (To subscribe to linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: send "subscribe > linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > > pNFS mailing list > pNFS@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
