On Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:36:39 -0700
Ben Greear <greearb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> static int nfs_sockaddr_match_ipaddr6(const struct sockaddr *sa1,
> const struct sockaddr *sa2)
> {
> const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin1 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa1;
> const struct sockaddr_in6 *sin2 = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa2;
>
> if (ipv6_addr_scope(&sin1->sin6_addr) == IPV6_ADDR_SCOPE_LINKLOCAL &&
> sin1->sin6_scope_id != sin2->sin6_scope_id)
> return 0;
>
> return ipv6_addr_equal(&sin1->sin6_addr, &sin1->sin6_addr);
>
> Looks like this last line, second argument should be &sin2->sin6_addr ???
>
> Thanks,
> Ben
>
Ouch. Yes, that does look wrong. Care to send a patch to fix it?
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
