> -----Original Message----- > From: Chuck Lever [mailto:chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 7:43 PM > To: Tayade, Nilesh > Cc: linux-nfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: NFS version4 maximum on-the-wire data size. > > > > > > Also we use 2.6.22 kernel version (it's old, and have no option of > > changing it) on our Intel boxes. I was just wondering is there any > > kernel-version Vs. NFS version mapping (I assume it's not, but just > to > > be sure about)? I have never seen NFSv2 running on our boxes. I am > going > > to write certain applications on top of NFS. So wanted to be sure if > > NFSv2 should be supported at all (is it so widely used on recent > > systems, compared to NFSv3/v4)? > > With certain exceptions, applications shouldn't generally be aware of > what NFS version is in use. Without knowing more about your > applications, it's hard to make any more than a very general statement. Well, to be specific - I need to deal with packet sniffers (capturing the NFS packets) and so I need to consider the NFS versions as the packet contains will differ (different procedure calls, Error codes etc.). > > -- > chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com > > Thanks, Nilesh nilesh.tayade@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
