On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:17:04AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:52 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Hello, > > > > here comes a v2 of the patch that improves the commit log with a more > > detailed analysis of the breakage introduced by df486a2 > > (= v2.6.36-rc2~34^2~1 BTW) and additionally undoes the "default y" for > > RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5. > > > > So compared to the state before df486a2 the changes are: > > > > NFS_V4 selects CRYPTO > > NFSD_V4 selects CRYPTO > > RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 doesn't depend on EXPERIMENTAL anymore > > RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 now depends on CRYPTO instead of selecting it > > > > Best regards > > Uwe > > > > ----------------------------->8---------------------------- > > > > This is a follow up to > > > > df486a2 (NFS: Fix the selection of security flavours in Kconfig) > > > > Before df486a2 NFS_V4 selected RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 but didn't enforce the > > latter's dependency EXPERIMENTAL. df486a2 removed RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5's > > dependency on EXPERIMENTAL but additionally let it depend on CRYPTO > > (instead of select CRYPTO before). So it was still possible to have a > > config that has NFS_V4 but not RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5. Moreover df486a2 > > changed the dependency of NFS_V4 and NFSD_V4 on RPCSEC_GSS_KRB5 from > > As I said, the fix is to remove that dependency. I have a fix for the > NFS client, but the server has more insidious dependencies on RPCSEC_GSS > due to a poorly designed SECINFO implementation. Yes, I still remember this, so I suggest to take my patch before 2.6.36 and you can fix it in the merge window for 2.6.37, no? Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
