> On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:35:01AM +0800, Bian Naimeng wrote:
>>> From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>
... snip ...
>> If i use the patch 78155ed75f470710f2aecb3e75e3d97107ba8374, this case will OK
>> at STEP5, however, it's will fail when remove this patch.
>
> How does it fail, exactly?
>
>> So i think it's no good for the network recovery, what do you think about it,
>> or give me some suggestions, thanks very much.
>
> The theoretical problem with the patch is that time changes could cause
> the server to return spurious errors when the client hands it state that
> should still be good.
>
> We might be able to solve that by using a different time source?
>
Hi bruce, Have you got a idea to solve it?
--
Regards
Bian Naimeng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
