Andy, I merged these patches with restored sign-offs and a couple minor touch-ups to make sure all compile. There's still zero diff from the original pnfs-submit branch. The pnfs-all-latest tip is at pnfs-all-2.6.35-2010-08-19. With regards to the patch descriptions, we've changed the patcheset so much it just makes more sense to re-write the commentary when we're close to have the final version. Let's get on with the renaming now and then we'll continue to rearrange the set for review and clean it up further. Benny On Aug. 14, 2010, 0:31 +0300, andros@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Here is the pnfs-submit tree all squashed and reorganized. The resultant tree > is unchanged. The patch comments and Signed-off-by's need to be added. > > We may want to split or re-order some of the patches. I left the "introduce > new file" patches #6-9 unsquashed, but we probably want to squash them into > the patch that uses them first. > > Patches 1-4 are not pnfs patches, and should be submitted to Trond/Bruce. > > Patch #50 "SQUASHME pnfs_submit: remove this unused code" > should not be squashed, but removed. > > Patches 47,-49 are for the post-submit trees. > > -->Andy > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
