On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 20:29 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > - Increment mtime by a nanosecond when necessary. > > You cannot be more precise than the backing file system: this causes > non monotonity when the inodes are flushed (has happened in the past) Um, can't you? You can't *store* timestamps which are more precise, but they can be in cache can't they? And since you're not going to drop it from cache and bring it back in again within 4ms, that ought to suffice? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@xxxxxxxxx Intel Corporation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
