On 17 Aug 10 19:21, Trond Myklebust wrote: > It looks like a regression in the Linux kernel memory management. > > I agree that order 4 allocations are always going to be unreliable, but > if it was consistently working before, and is now consistently not > working, then something must have changed, and I know that part of the > NFS code has not changed... Hello, Just to clarify this. The setup with automount adn NFS4 is new so I while the NFS3 setup is working for years now. I never experience this with NFS3 so it may be a NFS4 only problem. As you can see from the mails I am not the only one having the problem with version 4 in this regard. I think setups with automount and version 3 are much more common so a regression there would have been noticed a lot faster. Kind regards, Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
