Being a hash table, hlist is the best option. There is currently some ugliness were we treat "->next == NULL" as a special case to avoid having to initialise the whole array. This change nicely gets rid of that case. Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@xxxxxxx> --- include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h | 2 +- net/sunrpc/cache.c | 28 +++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h index 61f521f..5782154 100644 --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/cache.h @@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ struct cache_req { * delayed awaiting cache-fill */ struct cache_deferred_req { - struct list_head hash; /* on hash chain */ + struct hlist_node hash; /* on hash chain */ struct list_head recent; /* on fifo */ struct cache_head *item; /* cache item we wait on */ void *owner; /* we might need to discard all defered requests diff --git a/net/sunrpc/cache.c b/net/sunrpc/cache.c index 2fdd66b..551ed44 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/cache.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/cache.c @@ -506,7 +506,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cache_purge); static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cache_defer_lock); static LIST_HEAD(cache_defer_list); -static struct list_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE]; +static struct hlist_head cache_defer_hash[DFR_HASHSIZE]; static int cache_defer_cnt; struct thread_deferred_req { @@ -551,9 +551,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) list_add(&dreq->recent, &cache_defer_list); - if (cache_defer_hash[hash].next == NULL) - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache_defer_hash[hash]); - list_add(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]); + hlist_add_head(&dreq->hash, &cache_defer_hash[hash]); /* it is in, now maybe clean up */ discard = NULL; @@ -561,7 +559,7 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) discard = list_entry(cache_defer_list.prev, struct cache_deferred_req, recent); list_del_init(&discard->recent); - list_del_init(&discard->hash); + hlist_del_init(&discard->hash); cache_defer_cnt--; } spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock); @@ -580,9 +578,9 @@ static int cache_defer_req(struct cache_req *req, struct cache_head *item) wait_for_completion_interruptible_timeout( &sleeper.completion, req->thread_wait); spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock); - if (!list_empty(&sleeper.handle.hash)) { + if (!hlist_unhashed(&sleeper.handle.hash)) { list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.recent); - list_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash); + hlist_del_init(&sleeper.handle.hash); cache_defer_cnt--; } spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock); @@ -608,24 +606,20 @@ static void cache_revisit_request(struct cache_head *item) struct cache_deferred_req *dreq; struct list_head pending; - struct list_head *lp; + struct hlist_node *lp, *tmp; int hash = DFR_HASH(item); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pending); spin_lock(&cache_defer_lock); - lp = cache_defer_hash[hash].next; - if (lp) { - while (lp != &cache_defer_hash[hash]) { - dreq = list_entry(lp, struct cache_deferred_req, hash); - lp = lp->next; + hlist_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, lp, tmp, + &cache_defer_hash[hash], hash) if (dreq->item == item) { - list_del_init(&dreq->hash); + hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash); list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending); cache_defer_cnt--; } - } - } + spin_unlock(&cache_defer_lock); while (!list_empty(&pending)) { @@ -646,7 +640,7 @@ void cache_clean_deferred(void *owner) list_for_each_entry_safe(dreq, tmp, &cache_defer_list, recent) { if (dreq->owner == owner) { - list_del_init(&dreq->hash); + hlist_del_init(&dreq->hash); list_move(&dreq->recent, &pending); cache_defer_cnt--; } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html