On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 01:40:26PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 19:24:32 -0400 > "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 04:14:37PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > (Incremental on top of your last patch, with some noise due to moving > > > stuff around to avoid forward references. I'll clean these up and > > > resend.) > > > > > > Then we could also get rid of some of the individual flags (nfs4_init at > > > least), I think. > > > > Here's what I'm thinking of applying. (Lightly tested.) > > > > I gave them some basic smoke testing and looked them over and they seem > to be ok. Unfortunately, I don't really have an exhaustive test for > this sort of thing, but it does seem to fix the problem that > was originally reported to me. I also experimented a little with bringing nfs and rpcbind up and down and didn't see any problems. Applied for 2.6.36. --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
