Re: write_ports delfd case

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:32:57 -0400
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 07/19/10 03:21 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> > Does anyone know what __write_ports_delfd() is meant to do?
> >
> > The block comment above write_ports claims it handles writes of the form
> > "-<file descriptor>", which makes no sense (the file table of the writer
> > has nothing to do with anything).  It's called only when the character
> > after the "-" is a digit, but the names it matches against (generated by
> > svc_one_sock_name()) start with "ipv4" or "ipv6".
> 
> I suspect the comment above write_ports() is not correct.  I assumed 
> that delfd was symmetrical with addfd, but it isn't.  More likely, addfd 
> returns a string name that can be passed to write_ports (with a 
> preceding '-') to terminate the socket.

Yeah -- seems broken to me. Given that it clearly doesn't work and I'm
not aware of anyone having complained, perhaps it would be best to
remove it?

-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux