On 07/13/2010 06:55 PM, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 3:19 AM, Xiaotian Feng wrote:
From 6c3a91091b2910c23908a9f9953efcf3df14e522 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:02:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 12/30] selinux: tag avc cache alloc as non-critical
Failing to allocate a cache entry will only harm performance not correctness.
Do not consume valuable reserve pages for something like that.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra<a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suresh Jayaraman<sjayaraman@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Xiaotian Feng<dfeng@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
security/selinux/avc.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
index 3662b0f..9029395 100644
--- a/security/selinux/avc.c
+++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct avc_node *avc_alloc_node(void)
{
struct avc_node *node;
- node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ node = kmem_cache_zalloc(avc_node_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC);
if (!node)
goto out;
--
1.7.1.1
Why not just replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_NOWAIT?
This would NOT consume the valuable last pages.
But replace GFP_ATOMIC with GFP_NOWAIT can not prevent avc_alloc_node
consume reserved pages.
Mitchell Erblich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
