On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:02:12AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > On 07/ 7/10 05:10 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 04:53:34PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote: > >>Some well-known NFSv3 clients drop their directory entry caches when > >>they receive replies with no WCC data. > > > >Can we include any more details? (And/or a simple test case that > >demonstrates the difference?) > > I have a version of this patch with a much more comprehensive > description which I can post later today. > > As for a test case... among other things, I untarred a large tarball > on a Mac OS 10.6 NFS client, and, once the server was fixed, it went > as quickly as you would expect. Before, it took much longer. By the way, why isn't this reproduceable on the Linux client? If it's ignoring whether updates are atomic--is that really OK? --b. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
