On Jul 6, 2010, at 10:46 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 07/06/2010 05:31 PM, Fred Isaman wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>
> <snip>
>>> @@ -1547,9 +1548,8 @@ pnfs_writepages(struct nfs_write_data *wdata, int how)
>>> numpages = nfs_page_array_len(args->pgbase, args->count);
>>>
>>> dprintk("%s: Calling layout driver (how %d) write with %d pages\n",
>>> - __func__,
>>> - how,
>>> - numpages);
>>> + __func__, how, numpages);
>>> +
>>> if (!pnfs_use_rpc(nfss))
>>> wdata->pdata.pnfsflags |= PNFS_NO_RPC;
>>
>> Just curious, what branch is this based on? The above code was removed in the pnfs-submit branches a while ago.
>>
>> Other than that, looks good.
>>
>
> It's over pnfs-all-latest because for me I need the bigger tree for actually testing
> my code. So more work for Benny when squashing to sort out the hunks.
>
> But if it was removed what patch brings it back, this is odd. Benny?
No, that makes sense then. It is removed in pnfs-submit, then the removal patch is immediately reverted.
Fred
>
>> Fred
>>
>
> Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
