[PATCH 5/6] SQUASHME: pnfs-commit: Fix scariness in nfs4_clear_inode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It does not look right to clear out basic nfs RPC resources
before calling layout_return.

Also, for me a layout is an inner resource to delegation, the
delegation is acquired during open, a layout later. So it's
proper to return the layout before the delegation

Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/nfs/inode.c |    7 +++----
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
index 7989dea..916d6d0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
@@ -1351,13 +1351,12 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
  */
 void nfs4_clear_inode(struct inode *inode)
 {
-	/* If we are holding a delegation, return it! */
-	nfs_inode_return_delegation_noreclaim(inode);
-	/* First call standard NFS clear_inode() code */
-	nfs_clear_inode(inode);
 #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
 	pnfs_return_layout(inode, NULL, NULL, RETURN_FILE, true);
 #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
+	/* If we are holding a delegation, return it! */
+	nfs_inode_return_delegation_noreclaim(inode);
+	nfs_clear_inode(inode);
 }
 #endif
 
-- 
1.6.6.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux