On 07/06/2010 04:37 PM, Andy Adamson wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2010, at 5:46 PM, <Daniel.Muntz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > What I consider an 'extremely lame pNFS file layout server' is one > that requires COMMITs to the DS and then depends upon the LAYOUTCOMMIT > to communicate the commited data size to the MDS. > (And mtime) This is not "lame" this is "smart". There are tens of DS(s) but thousands of clients with thousands of open files each, better make the clients busy then the servers. You are not looking scale. > -->Andy > Boaz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
