Re: [PATCH] sunrpc: split the vs_hidden flag into TCP and UDP variants

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 10:35 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 09:14:10 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 08:58 -0400, Staubach_Peter@xxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Does this mean that the Linux NFS server will no longer respond to NFSv4
> > > requests coming in over UDP?  If it will continue to do so, wouldn't it
> > > be more important to solve that correctly?
> > 
> > Agreed. Either we keep UDP support on the server and advertise it too,
> > or we should throw it out altogether...
> > 
> 
> Ok, I'll start working on it. A question though...
> 
> When we get a NFSv4 request over UDP, what's the correct response?
> A PROG_MISMATCH RPC error?
> 

Yes. A PROG_MISMATCH would be appropriate for that case.

Cheers
  Trond

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux USB Development]     [Linux Media Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Info]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux